Love him or hate him you can’t ignore him. Rest in Peace Steve Jobs.
was working on a project which was producing a report to be published
on the desktop. They bought the very little known (even now) Apple
LISA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Lisa I was blown away by how I could simply drag and drop a spreadsheet
into a document. With my IBM PC this would be an hour’s work and I
might or might not be successful at the end of it. The machine was
totally integrated and I would later come across the same concept in
the iPhone. Of course they were very expensive, when was a Rolls
Royce ever cheap? But as the company has been more and more
successful, the prices have come down and now more and more millions
of people are benefiting from his basic concepts that the products
should be simple, integrated, functional and beautiful. Us « AppleFans » hope and prey Apple will not again fall into the
abyss as it did when he was kicked out of his own company in 1985
until he returned to rescue it in 1996. Steve Jobs was (and even in his death continues to be) the sort of
person who arouses emotion. I have admiration for Steve Jobs, but
many have envy, jealousy and even hatred. Love him or hate him you
can’t ignore him. Rest in Peace Steve Jobs.
Love him or hate him you can’t ignore him. Rest in Peace Steve Jobs.
Euro - look back to… 13th February 2010
Simply put, dénouement is the unraveling or untying of the complexities of a plot.
The Top 10 Health & Fitness Trends of 2010 | The Outside Blog
« 5 Gifts for the Adventure Junkie with Everything | Main | Ry Cuming’s Top 3 Surf Spots »
December 21, 2010
The Top 10 Health & Fitness Trends of 2010
Photo courtesy of XWRN on Flickr.People in 1910 would’ve died of embarrassment if they saw some of 2010’s fitness trends. (Try handing a Shake Weight to a centenarian.) Other trends would’ve made a caveman proud. Presenting the top 10 fitness trends of the year, from the Paleolithic to the futuristic
10. iFitness
A quick search in the Apple store for “work out” returns 157 apps, many of them designed to dictate your workout, keep track of calories burned, and keep you motivated. This is the year of the smartphone as gym buddy. But, as Outside’s Lab Rat asks in a new article, is that really a good thing?9. Vitamin D
You need extra for bone health! No you don’t! The great vitamin D debate raged this year, with people like Dr. Robert Heaney, a researcher at Nebraska’s Creighton University, making lofty claims like: “We won’t know the true burden of chronic disease until we eradicate vitamin D deficiency.” But a study released in late November proved otherwise. “For most people, taking extra calcium and vitamin D supplements is not indicated,” Dr. Clifford J. Rosen an osteoporosis expert at the Maine Medical Center Research Institute, told the New York Times. The debate rages on.8. Boot Camp
Blame the Biggest Loser, military mystique, and budget consciousness for the steady rise in Boot Camp popularity. At the end of 2009, the American College of Sports Medicine predicted Boot Camp, a group fitness regimen based on military workouts and led by drill-sergeant-like instructors, would be the 16th most popular trend in 2010. Now they predict Boot Camp will be one of the top 10 fitness trends in 2011.
7. The Shake Weight
Perhaps you, like many other Americans, first saw the shake weight while watching television with your extended family, when a harmless show like “Cake Boss” was interrupted by women holding a device that looked like, well, um, er, you couldn’t say—not in front of your conservative in-laws. Thankfully you weren’t the only one whose mind was in the gutter; SNL parodied the arm-toning device in April. But the Shake Weight creators are getting the last laugh: The Shake Weight For Men ad on YouTube has registered almost two million views, and the weight itself raked in $40 million by April, 2010.
6. The Gluten-Free Diet
It seems a lot of people with no prior history of gluten intolerance suddenly came down with celiac disease in 2010. (In all fairness, better screening properly diagnosed thousands of people who didn’t know they had it.) Brought on by a gluten protein found in wheat, the autoimmune disease can wreak havoc on the small intestine, causing diarrhea and fatigue. The answer? Avoid all foods containing gluten. The fad? Less than one percent of Americans have the disease, but sales of gluten-free foods have skyrocketed, leading one gluten-free specialty brand to sell for $22 million in December.5. Tone-Up Shoes and Clothes
If you don’t have the derriere of your dreams, Reebok, Sketchers, and MBT promise you will—if you just wear their shoes. No squats required. The theory is the shoes have unstable soles, so you have to work harder to stay upright and not fall over, engaging your muscles and toning your legs and bum. However a study funded by the American Council on Exercise found that none of the shoes provide any statistically significant boost in muscle exertion or caloric burn. But that hasn’t stopped companies from taking the tone-while-you-do-almost-nothing fad to the next level: clothes that make your muscles work harder, according to manufacturers, debuted in 2010.4. & 3. P90X and TRX
Body-weight resistance workouts you can do anywhere were huge in 2010, with P90X and TRX leading the craze. P90X is a 90-day, DVD-based workout program that touts “muscle confusion”—constantly challenging the muscles to do different movements—as the way to a better body. TRX is a simple band that you can hang from almost anywhere to intensify a weight workout. For the ultimate muscle burn, savvy exercisers have combined the two, performing many of the P90X moves on a TRX system. Editor Ryan Krogh, in an effort to get buff for the ladies, gave the P90X system a try. What did he think? Read all about it here.2. Barefoot Running
Believers in barefoot running claim the practice encourages a more natural gait, and reduces injury by building up the muscles in the foot. The craze picked up speed with the 2009 release of Born to Run. For people who want to experience running the way our ancestors did without getting dirty (or dirty looks), Vibram introduced their FiveFinger shoes, a thin sole meant to mimic barefoot running. Toes around the world have never looked better.
1. Paleo Fitness
Similar to barefoot running and the comeback of bodyweight exercises, fitness regimens that imitate what our ancestors were doing when they developed the first stone tools were hot in 2010. Frenchman Erwan LeCorre led the trend with his “MovNat” or move naturally-branded routines. Climbing trees, running barefoot, picking up logs, throwing rocks—it’s all a part of paleo fitness. And if you feel you’ve lost your natural instincts to do such activities or feel stupid doing them alone, you can pay to have someone tell you and a large group of people what to do. Your Paleolithic ancestors would be proud of your effort. Maybe.
http://outside-blog.away.com/blog/2010/12/the-top-10-health-fitness-trends-of…“>Email this post | Permalink
Measuring Type : Matt Robinson
Measuring TypeA selection of the most commonly used typefaces were compared for how economical they are with the amount of ink which they use at the same point size. Large scale renditions of the typefaces were drawn out with ballpoint pens, allowing the remaining ink levels to display the ink efficiency of each typeface.
Collaboration with Tom Wrigglesworth.
Save ink - use Garamond!!
Mocked Meteorologist Gets Last Laugh
WHERE DO YOUR TAXES GO?
Remember it is YOUR taxes which pay THE METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE and for “action” against “Global Warming” by your government. “Global Warming Theory” is, at best, misguided. At worst it is an excuse to charge you more for ‘carbon tax” etc to pay for Bankers Bonuses.
Brazil needs help re the forgotten ecosystem of Brazil
hornswoggled - definition of hornswoggled
I BET YOU WERE WONDERING IF YOU READ THE ARTICLE BELOW
Anchoring Effect « You Are Not So Smart
The Misconception: You rationally analyze all factors before making a choice or determining value.
The Truth: Your first perception lingers in your mind, affecting later perceptions and decisions.
You walk into a clothing store and see what is probably the most bad ass leather jacket you’ve ever seen.
You try it on, look in the mirror and decide you must have it. While wearing this item, you imagine onlookers will clutch their chests and gasp every time you walk into a room or cross a street. You lift the sleeve to check the price – $1,000.
Well, that’s that, you think. You start to head back to the hanger when a salesperson stops you.
“You like it?”
“I love it, but it’s just too much.”
“No, that jacket is on sale right now for $400.”
It’s expensive, and you don’t need it really, but $600 off the price seems like a great deal for a coat which will increase your cool by a factor of 11.
You put it on the card, unaware you’ve been tricked by the oldest retail con in the business.
One of my first jobs was selling leather coats, and I depended on the anchoring effect to earn commission. Each time, I figured it was obvious to customers the company I worked for marked up the prices to unrealistic extremes. Yet, over and over, when people heard the sale price, they smiled and wrestled with their better judgment.
The prices you expect to pay, where did those expectations originate?
To figure out how those channels were dug, those paths were beaten, answer this:
Source: WorldTravels.com
Is the population of Venezuela greater or fewer than 65 million?
Go ahead and guess.
Ok, another question, how many people do you think live Venezuela?
Come up with a figure and keep it in your head. We’ll come back to this in a few paragraphs.
In 1974, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman conducted a study asking a similar question.
They asked people to estimate how many African countries were part of the United Nations, but first they spun a wheel of fortune.
The wheel was painted with numbers from 0 to 100, but rigged to always land on 10 or 65. When the arrow stopped spinning, they asked the person in the experiment to say if they believed the percentage of countries was higher or lower than the number on the wheel.
They then asked people to estimate what they thought the actual percentage of nations was.
They found people who landed on 10 in the first half of the experiment guessed around 25 percent of Africa was part of the U.N. Those who landed on 65 said around 45 percent.
They had been locked in place by the anchoring effect.
The trick here is no one really knew what the answer was. They had to guess, yet it didn’t feel like a guess. As far as they knew, the wheel was a random number generator, but it produced something concrete to work from.
When they adjusted their estimates, they couldn’t avoid the anchor.
The populations of South American countries probably aren’t numbers you have memorized. You need some sort of cue, a point of reference.
You searched your mental assets for something of value concerning Venezuela – the flag, the language, Hugo Chavez – but the population figures aren’t in your head.
What is in your head is the figure I gave you, 65 million, and it’s right there up front influencing how you answer the second question. When you have nothing else to go on, you fixate on the information at hand.
The population of Venezuela is 28 million people. How far away was your answer?
If you are like most people you assumed something much higher.
The numbers generated by the wheel of fortune, the number I gave you and the $1,000 price tag are all anchors, unwanted guests in the mind which change the mood of the party.
Anchors can make big numbers seem small, throw estimates out of whack and lead you into decisions which, in the long view, seem silly.
In many situations, people make estimates by starting from an initial value that is adjusted to yield the final answer. The initial value, or starting point, may be suggested by the formulation of the problem, or it may be the result of partial computation. In either case, adjustments are typically insufficient…that is, different starting points yield different estimates, which are biased toward the initial values.
- “Judgment Under Uncertainty” by Kahneman, Slovic and Tversky
You depend on anchoring every day to predict the outcome of events, to estimate how much time something will take or how much money something will cost.
When you need to choose between options, or estimate a value, you need footing to stand on.
How much should you be paying for cable? How much should your electricity bill be each month? What is a good price for rent in this neighborhood?
You need an anchor from which to compare, and when someone is trying to sell you something they are more than happy to provide one. The problem is, even when you know this, you can’t ignore it.
When shopping for a car, you know it isn’t a completely honest transaction. The real price is probably lower than what they are asking for on the window sticker, yet the anchor price is still going to affect your decision.
As you look over the vehicle, you don’t consider how many factories the company owns, how many employees they pay. You don’t pore over engineering diagrams or profit reports. You don’t consider the price of iron or the expensive investments the manufacturer is making into safety testing.
The price you are willing to pay has little to do with these considerations because they are as far from you at the point of purchase as the population of Venezuela.
Even if you’ve done some research online, you don’t know for sure exactly what the car is worth, or what the dealer paid for it. The focus instead is the manufacturer’s suggested retail price, and no matter how unrealistic it is, you can’t help but be tethered to it.
When you haggle over the price, you are pulling away from the anchor, and both you and the dealer know this.
The anchoring effect can also slip in unannounced.
Drazen Prelec and Dan Ariely conducted an experiment at MIT in 2006 where they had students bid on items in a bizarre auction.
The researchers would hold up a bottle of wine, or a textbook, or a cordless trackball and then describe in detail how awesome it was.
Then, each student had to write down the last two digits of their social security number as if it was the price of the item. If the last two digits were 11, then the bottle of wine was priced at $11. If the two numbers were 88, the cordless trackball was $88.
After they wrote down the pretend price, they bid.
Sure enough, the anchoring effect scrambled their ability to judge the value of the items.
People with high social security numbers paid up to 346 percent more than those with low numbers.
People with numbers from 80 to 99 paid on average $26 for the trackball, while those with 00 to 19 paid around $9.
Social security numbers were the anchor in this experiment only because we requested them. We could have just as well asked for the current temperature or the manufacturer’s suggested retail price. Any question, in fact, would have created the anchor. Does that seem rational? Of course not.
- Dan Ariely from his book, “Predictably Irrational”
The auction experimenters conducted another study in which they asked people to listen to annoying sounds for money. The researchers initially offered either 90 cents or 10 cents for a blast of awful electronic screaming, and then they asked the subjects how much would be the lowest possible price they would need to be paid to listen to the sound again.
People who were offered 10 cents said it would take about 33 cents to continue. People offered 90 said it would take 73.
They repeated the experiment in other ways, but no matter how they messed with the sounds or the payouts, those who were first offered a low payment consistently agreed to lower amounts than those used to better wages. People who got more money at first were unwilling to accept lower payments later.
If you move up to a nice car or a big house, a nice computer or an expensive smartphone, you become anchored and find it difficult to back move down later, even if you should.
Those who buy expensive purses know they are being hornswoggled, at least at some level, yet the anchoring effect still reaches into their bank account.
Source: sybarites.com
Does a $800 Louis Vuitton purse function better than a $25 handbag from Wal-Mart? No, not even if it was hand made from giraffe leather and stitched by real, magical leprechauns. It’s just a purse.
But the anchor is set. Louis Vuitton bags are expensive, and that in itself has social value. People still buy them and are happy with their purchase.
If Wal-Mart offered a purse at $800 it would live out its life on the shelf. The price would be so far from the anchors already set by the store it would seem like a bad deal.
Like most psychological phenomenon, anchoring can be used to manipulate people to do good. The best example is the door-in-the-face technique.
In a 1975 study by Catalan, Lewis, Vincent and Wheeler, researchers asked a group of students to volunteer as camp counselors two hours per week for two years.
They all said no.
The researchers followed up by asking if they would volunteer to supervise a single two-hour trip.
Half said yes.
Without first asking for the two-year commitment, only 17 percent agreed.
Remember this study if you are ever in a negotiation - make your initial request far too high.
You have to start somewhere, and your initial decision or calculation greatly influences all the choices which follow, cascading out, each tethered to the anchors set before.
Many of the choices you make every day are reruns of past decisions, like channels dug into a dirt road by a wagon train of selections, you follow the path created by your former self.
External anchors, like prices before a sale or ridiculous requests, are obvious enough you can sidestep the actual price, the real appeal. Internal, self-generated anchors, are not so easy to bypass.
You visit the same circuit of websites everyday, eat basically the same few breakfasts.
When it comes time to buy new cat food or take your car in for repairs, you have old favorites.
Come election time, you pretty much already know who will and will not get your vote.
These choices, so predictable, ask yourself what drives them. Are old anchors controlling your current decisions?
When you are parting with your money, know the person on the other side of the deal thinks you are not so smart and is depending on the anchoring effect when they tell you how much you are about to save.
Links:
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
THINK ABOUT THIS EVERYTIME BEFORE YOU BUY ANYTHING
Whats the newest-new-thing?
Whats the newest-new-thing?
